![]() ![]() Results: The 11 tasks proved relatively robust, and excellent feedback was obtained from the trainees regarding educational benefit. ![]() Baseline trainee scores were compared with expert scores to evaluate construct validity. PGY 1 residents (n = 4) were enrolled in a prospective Institutional Review Board-approved pilot study that included proctored orientation and baseline testing, self-training to proficiency, and proctored post-testing (conducted over a 4-wk period). Expert performance was used to establish training endpoints and to create a video tutorial. Methods: Using commercially available bench models, 11 standardized tasks (ranging from 2-handed knot-tying to running subcuticular closure) were developed and scored using previously validated metrics based on time and errors. ![]() Background: The purpose of this study was to develop a structured open skills curriculum for knot-tying and suturing using expert-derived performance goals and to examine its feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and construct validity. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |